Comparison of the Bone Densitometry Results of Norland XR-36 and XR-46 Dual X Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Scanners in the Rat Femurs

dc.contributor.authorKoc, Zehra Pinar
dc.contributor.authorKarayalcin, Binnur
dc.contributor.authorYildiz, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorDonmez, Baris Ozgur
dc.contributor.authorOguz, Nurettin
dc.contributor.authorOguz, Nurettin
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-12T17:08:01Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentFırat Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground and objectives: It is important to obtain comparable results from different densitometry scanners in especially experimental studies. The aim of this experimental study in rat femurs is to compare bone densitometry results determined by two different DXA scanners of the same manufacturer performed at two different institutes. Materials and methods: Sixty female Wistar rats were the subject of this study. The rats were divided into four group and the groups were as follows: group 1 (n=15) (control), group 2 (n=15) (sham operated), group 3 (n=15) (ovariectomized) and group 4 (n=15) (ovariectomized and treated with losartan for eight weeks). Femurs of rats were collected and analyzed by Norland XR-36 and Norland XR-46 model DXA devices at different institutes by the same staff. In order to compare the two scanners results Paired samples T test, ANOVA and post hoc test was performed and p<0.05 considered significant. Results: The (bone mineral concentration) BMC and (bone mineral density) BMD results of two different scanners were not significantly different according to statistical analysis (p> 0.05) in the all 4 groups. Additionally BMD values were significantly decreased in group 3 compared to the control group (p<0,005). Although losartan treatment caused a significant increase in the BMD values of group 4 compared to the ovariectomy group (p<0.005) this increase could not reach the BMD values in the control group. Conclusions: Although it is important to use the same scanner for follow up DXA measurements in human, this experimental rat study shows that different scanners of the same manufacturer provides comparable results.
dc.identifier.doi10.2174/157340561104150727171631
dc.identifier.endpage287
dc.identifier.issn1573-4056
dc.identifier.issn1875-6603
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5809-0369
dc.identifier.startpage284
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2174/157340561104150727171631
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/49872
dc.identifier.volume11
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000358784700009
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBentham Science Publ Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofCurrent Medical Imaging Reviews
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260511
dc.subjectDual X-ray absorptiometry
dc.subjectrepeatability
dc.subjectrats
dc.subjectosteoporosis
dc.titleComparison of the Bone Densitometry Results of Norland XR-36 and XR-46 Dual X Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Scanners in the Rat Femurs
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar