Comparative Microstructural, Mechanical, and Tribological Evaluation of Cu Matrix Composites Reinforced with B4C, B, Cr, Co, Al2O3, and Graphite via Powder Metallurgy

dc.contributor.authorMacit, Cevher Kursat
dc.contributor.authorGurgenc, Turan
dc.contributor.authorAksakal, Bunyamin
dc.contributor.authorAslan, Naim
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-08T07:11:43Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.departmentFırat Üniveristesi
dc.description.abstractCopper and its alloys are widely used in electrical, automotive, aerospace, and energy applications because of their excellent thermal and electrical conductivity. However, the low hardness and poor wear resistance of pure Cu limit its use under tribologically demanding sliding conditions. In this study, Cu matrix composites reinforced with 1 wt.% boron carbide (B4C), boron (B), chromium (Cr), cobalt (Co), alumina (Al2O3), and graphite (Gr) were fabricated by powder metallurgy and comparatively evaluated under identical processing and testing conditions. Phase constitution and microstructural characteristics were analyzed by XRD, SEM, and EDS, while mechanical and tribological behavior was assessed by Vickers hardness and dry sliding wear tests. All reinforcements improved the hardness of the Cu matrix compared with unreinforced Cu. The hardness increase followed the order Cu-B4C (68.91%) > Cu-B (66.43%) > Cu-Gr (63.97%) > Cu-Al2O3 (61.79%) > Cu-Cr (42.69%) > Cu-Co (36.04%). Dry sliding wear tests, performed under a 10 N normal load, 0.05 m s(-1) sliding speed, and 1000 m sliding distance against a 316L stainless-steel ball, showed that all reinforced composites exhibited lower mass loss and more stable sliding behavior than pure Cu. Among all samples, Cu-B4C displayed the best wear performance, with a 154.8% improvement in wear resistance relative to pure Cu. SEM analysis of the worn surfaces revealed that reinforcement addition reduced severe plastic deformation, groove formation, and delamination, leading to a more stable wear regime. Graphite- and boron-containing composites benefited from interfacial lubrication and contact stabilization, whereas B4C and Al2O3 improved wear resistance through rigid-particle strengthening and enhanced load-bearing capacity. By comparing ceramic, metalloid, metallic, oxide, and solid-lubricating reinforcements at the same low addition level and under identical processing and testing conditions, this study provides a reinforcement-selection framework for Cu-based composites requiring improved hardness and dry-sliding durability.
dc.description.sponsorshipFirat University Research Fund [FUBAP-TEKF.26.26] -- The APC was funded by Firat University Research Fund (grant number FUBAP-TEKF.26.26).
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/lubricants14060243
dc.identifier.issn2075-4442
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105042849864
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants14060243
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11508/65119
dc.identifier.volume14
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001805192900001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMdpi
dc.relation.ispartofLubricants
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250903
dc.subjectCopper Matrix Composites
dc.subjectPowder Metallurgy
dc.subjectHardness
dc.subjectDry Sliding Wear
dc.subjectTribology
dc.subjectMicrostructure
dc.titleComparative Microstructural, Mechanical, and Tribological Evaluation of Cu Matrix Composites Reinforced with B4C, B, Cr, Co, Al2O3, and Graphite via Powder Metallurgy
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar